Independent AI due diligence for investors. EU AI Act readiness for operators. From a builder-operator who ships production AI systems — analytics engines, tender intelligence, AI-native SaaS — and then vets them for others. No product to upsell into the assessment. No vendor agenda.
Book a 30-min call See how I help
I sit on both sides of a table most people keep apart: I build production AI systems, and I vet them. Through EM Consulting, I design and ship AI analytics engines, tender & procurement-intelligence platforms, and AI-native SaaS products end to end. Then, for investors, I run independent due diligence on AI companies before a round closes — and for operators, I map real exposure under the EU AI Act by reading the primary text, not the headlines.
The value on the assessment side is the independent read: no product to upsell into it. Twenty-plus years across regulated, cross-border environments. Based in Vienna.
Explainable risk-scoring across thousands of structured records — reports, filings, transactions. Every flag comes with a plain-language reason, not a black-box score. Built to run inside your own infrastructure; your data never leaves your environment.
AI systems that turn thousands of tenders and filings into a single, queryable, risk-ranked view — cross-border, cross-currency, cross-language. I've built and operate platforms doing exactly this at production scale: AZTender (Azerbaijan) and Veritender (EU / institutional).
From spec to production: architecture, data pipeline, model integration, deployment. I design and ship AI-native SaaS platforms end to end — the same standard I hold vendors to when I'm the one doing due diligence.
An independent read on one AI company before you wire — or before your investor does. Tech reality vs pitch claims, the "AI moat" stress-test, team & build risk, data and evaluation discipline, EU AI Act exposure, and the red flags that survive a polished deck.
The 7 May omnibus did not delay the AI Act — it split it into four timelines. I re-derive yours against the amended text: prohibitions (live), GPAI (live since Aug 2025), transparency (still 2 August 2026), high-risk Annex III (now December 2027). Then classify your systems, score the gaps, and hand back a prioritised 30-day plan.
Most AI advice is sold by people who also sell the remediation — or who have never shipped the thing they're assessing. I do both jobs that are usually kept apart: I build production AI systems, and I vet them. Twenty-plus years across regulated, cross-border environments taught me where AI risk actually hides — in the eval suite and the org chart, not the slide. The independent read is the whole product. Nothing is being upsold to you underneath it.
Founder and team assessment, plus verification of data-room materials for plagiarism and AI-generated content — paired with the independent AI due diligence above.
Structured candidate and team assessment — pre-hire reads, team maps, high-potential identification — on the Talent Radar methodology.
College counseling, IB & Extended Essay guidance, and a free talent assessment — from the person who led the first IB implementation in an Azerbaijani state school.